(#v3vphjq) @latenightz Welcome, fellow ^Cer! ;-)
#xkuryfa
(#v3vphjq) @latenightz Welcome, fellow ^Cer! ;-)
I keep going back ânâ forth on whether to experiment with Pleroma on my Pi. :-) A Tildes post on the sad news that Feneas is struggling has rekindled the fire, oddly. I just like knowing, first-hand, whatâs involved in running these services; I feel it makes me a better yarn.social advocate. ^⨰^
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org (#r5m7hna) Oh, good to know. Ta!
@darch (#r5m7hna) Hâm⌠Isnât that an error message that you get when you havenât yet built the dependencies? Specifically the go.rice
dependency? I think that running make deps
â to build rice and minify â first might solve your problem. :-)
@prologic (#ezr5zyq) Oh, good. ^Ă^ Room for improvement/sourcing/etc., obviously. But happy to hear you like the bones of it. :-)
@maya@maya.land (#pboc5oa) Agreed. I like them. :-)
Huh. Just did a two-hour, recorded handover of Terraform code I wrote for a client. They had me destroy all the infrastructure live, pull the code apart in separate files, and build the infrastructure back up again. Exhilarating, and exhausting! Time for a beer. :-)
@pwr@bydasein.com (#buyselq) Oh! Writing a novel?
@movq (#enzvgvq) Oh, wow! Gorgeous! Thanks for sharing. :-)
@prologic @mckinley (#2eing7q) Actually, I think you worded it well. Certainly makes sense to me. Swap âopen sourceâ for âfree/libre softwareâ and I bet even #rms wouldâve been happy with what you emphasised. :-)
@prologic @lazarus (#2eing7q) I would never call you ignorant. ;-D But #rms would take umbrage with your conflating open source and free software, Iâd imagine. ââŚâopen sourceâ doesnât fully convey the importance of the movement and the potential long-term social problems caused by proprietary software. [FSF et al] sees OSI as being too concerned with promoting the practical benefits of non-proprietary software (including its profitability and the efficiency of a community-driven development model), and not concerned ethical [issues]âŚâ https://envs.sh/PH
@lazarus (#2eing7q) While I donât disagree with the points youâve raised, I do think there are other aspects to consider on the subject #rms and the FSF: e.g., the future of the latter as a vibrant, thriving organisation in the next decade and beyond; in particular, I think some comments on the recent LWN article raise good points regarding this.
Wow! âThe current state of the art is humans, mostly quadriplegic people, with chips which let them control robot arms with enough accuracy to pick up small delicate objects, play games, and type by thinking words. Current state of the art implants let people get tactile feedback too - they can intuitively know the position of the arm theyâre controlling and feel the amount of pressure on each finger tip.â https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26747773
âIn the larger sense, entrepreneurship in America is very much dead. That doesnât mean that it isnât thriving in a specific Silicon Valley subculture, that to be fair makes massive contributions to the broader economy. But it should make us question what makes the Valley so different from Main Street, USA. If not just to figure out how to export the model from Palo Alto to Oklahoma.â https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26781681
@hecanjog@hecanjog.com (#32lyv6q) Hear, hear! Drives me batty; that, and references to how âobviousâ or âsimpleâ such and such is. My friend, you donât have to think about any particular subject you might choose for more than a few minutes â particularly from the perspective of others â before such statements look naive and foolish. For goodness sake, I was reminded but a few hours ago that no two people see the same rainbow: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cTqRE4F6qJ4 â YT, sorry.
@prologic (#avpwgga) I didnât mean âin favour of my podâ btw, to clarify! I love it here! :-D Itâs just the way my brain works: off in ten different directions at once, on any given day.
Iâve decided to join IRCNow. :-) You know, âcause Iâm not busy enough as it is. :-P I will get back to that manifesto++ soon, @prologic, promise! :-D