First, the site was caught quietly publishing the machine learning-generated stories in the first place. Then the AI-generated content was found to be riddled with factual errors. Now, CNET’s AI also appears to have been a serial plagiarist — of actual humans’ work
Is it just me or is this stuff getting worse at an accelerating pace?
@firstname.lastname@example.org it will probably get worse before it gets better. But I mean, who uses CNET?! 😂