Speaking of Yarn and/or Twtxt + Activity Pub integration… Been thinking… If a decision is made to turn this into a full-fledged Twtxt bridging services between Twtxt <-> Activity Pub (which would make things much more transparent, because then
yarnd only has to speak Twtxt period)…
What do we (or can we) do about filling in context. Right now with this crappy half-baked implementation I have going (experimental) for
yarnd, I can just go grab the Activity Pub Note that the
inReplyTo references and inject that into the cache.
With a separate more transparent Twtxt <-> Activity Pub; what do we do? Even if we created a feed for the actor referenced in the
inReplyTo you wouldn’t know to follow them anyway…
@email@example.com I have thought briefly about this. I have no idea how this could be done with the current twtxt thread paradigm.
@prologic I’m probably wildly off as I don’t know how this is all implemented exactly, but it sounds like something the bridge itself will have to handle.
@mckinley I’m not sure it can be. It doesn’t make sense to me to create feeds for some other actor just because.