In-reply-to » @bender Standard twtxt is a microblog in its purest form. A blog, but smaller. It's just a list of posts to read, and that's an echochamber in the same way my regular blog is an echochamber. I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

@bender@twtxt.net Makes sense. We definitely need the ability to mute feeds from the Discover feed.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » QOTD: How do you back up your files?

@movq@www.uninformativ.de I remember your solution. Itā€™s very simple, I like it.

Yes, my backup target is my home server. I have a hard drive dedicated to Restic repositories. Itā€™s still not a real backup as I donā€™t have anything offsite but itā€™s better than my previous solution. I had two very old hard drives I kept plugged in to my desktop PC and I would (on very rare occasion) plug in another hard drive and copy all the files over to it. Luckily, Iā€™ve never suffered any significant data loss and I would rather not start now. Once I have automated backups on each of my machines, the next project is getting those backups offsite.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Me feed just rolled over. Letā€™s see if something breaks. šŸ˜‚

@movq@www.uninformativ.de

If you all were to clear your caches, would your clients fetch archived feeds?

No.

And Iā€™m also thinking of nuking my pod at some point and starting over. But maybe after we refactor a few important things.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » @bender Standard twtxt is a microblog in its purest form. A blog, but smaller. It's just a list of posts to read, and that's an echochamber in the same way my regular blog is an echochamber. I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

@bender I think it comes down to one of the principles Yarn.social was founded on, which is to say, users should have choices and what they ā€œseeā€ is not driven by ā€œalgorithmsā€. The ā€œDiscoverā€ view in and of itself has utility/value to others, and is otherwise just a ā€œviewā€ of a podā€™s cache, but I agree with you. It was even getting noisey for me šŸ¤£

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » @bender Standard twtxt is a microblog in its purest form. A blog, but smaller. It's just a list of posts to read, and that's an echochamber in the same way my regular blog is an echochamber. I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

@mckinley not a problem, but I donā€™t want to see it. When I get to see it constantly, without following it, then it becomes a problem. Blogs being echo chambers do not bother. They donā€™t ā€œcome to meā€. :-D

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » For example I noticed in this thread, someone, me, and you, and now it's just a bad @-mention mentioned Soren Peter with a bad link :/

In other words, there isnā€™t anything specifically wrong with the Twtxt spec (+extensions), but if you for example use a client and server combination that never considered the User-Agent header and check logs or intercept requests for your feed, than you end up missing an important part of the whole flow (unless you are of course deliberating ignoring that, e.g: 1-way feeds, news feeds, etc).

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » For example I noticed in this thread, someone, me, and you, and now it's just a bad @-mention mentioned Soren Peter with a bad link :/

In my opinion, this can all be solved by a ā€œbetter standard clientā€.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » @bendwr and I discussing something along the lines of: Media I.e: How to deal with or reduce noise from legacy feeds.

For example I noticed in this thread, someone, me, and you, and now itā€™s just a bad @-mention mentioned Soren Peter with a bad link :/

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » @bendwr and I discussing something along the lines of: Media I.e: How to deal with or reduce noise from legacy feeds.

This also just reminds me of the other problems that exist:

  • bad mentions.
  • knowing whether someone will youā€™ve @-mentioned will even see your reply at all.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » @prologic Your position doesn't make any sense: it's closing down and arbitrarily limiting the use of the Twtxt protocol. One more reason not to use https://twtxt.net/

@mckinley Yeah this is what was being ā€œcleaned upā€

Yo be honest I donā€™t think there is a good solution IMO

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » @bendwr and I discussing something along the lines of: Media I.e: How to deal with or reduce noise from legacy feeds.

@prologic@twtxt.net I think one-way feeds are okay and we shouldnā€™t discourage them so strongly. On the other hand, I think itā€™s the duty of a poderator to filter out feeds that are just noise from the Discover feed. I definitely consider a truckload of one-way posts mostly in another language to be noise. Did you get rid of Gopher Chat too? Iā€™d call that noise, for sure.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » @prologic Why do we need to avoid posting to the void? That's pretty much what twtxt was made for. I don't like the "Legacy feed" terminology, either. I support the delisting of ciberlandia.pt but I think this change is heading in a bad direction.

Youā€™re right we should
never be like Microshit šŸ˜†

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » @prologic Your position doesn't make any sense: it's closing down and arbitrarily limiting the use of the Twtxt protocol. One more reason not to use https://twtxt.net/

@bender@twtxt.net Standard twtxt is a microblog in its purest form. A blog, but smaller. Itā€™s just a list of posts to read, and thatā€™s an echochamber in the same way my regular blog is an echochamber. I donā€™t think thereā€™s anything wrong with that.

@prologic@twtxt.net I support the delisting of ciberlandia.pt in the Discover feed due to the sheer volume of posts from there and the fact that most of them are in Portuguese with this being a predominantly English-language pod.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » @bendwr and I discussing something along the lines of: Media I.e: How to deal with or reduce noise from legacy feeds.

@prologic@twtxt.net Why do we need to avoid posting to the void? Thatā€™s pretty much what twtxt was made for. I donā€™t like the ā€œLegacy feedā€ terminology, either. I support the delisting of ciberlandia.pt but I think this change is heading in a bad direction.

I like @sorenpeter@darch.dk ā€™s suggestion. It gives the users the information and lets them make their own decision instead of putting a big scary warning in their face. Thatā€™s what Microsoft does, and we shouldnā€™t be Microsoft.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Ex-White House Cyber Policy Director: Microsoft is a National Security Risk This week the Register spoke to former senior White House cyber policy director A.J. Grotto ā€” who complained it was hard to get even slight concessions from Microsoft: "If you go back to the SolarWinds episode from a few years ago ... [Microsoft] was essentially up-selling logging capability to federal agencies" instead of ma ... āŒ˜ Read more

@slashdot@feeds.twtxt.net Oh boi! šŸ˜† Gotta take a screenshot of this in case Microsoft demand the article be taken down šŸ¤£

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » @prologic Your position doesn't make any sense: it's closing down and arbitrarily limiting the use of the Twtxt protocol. One more reason not to use https://twtxt.net/

@dfaria Also, I donā€™t really care whether you continue to use my pod or not frankly.

One more reason not to use https://twtxt.net/

negative comments like this are completely unconstructive and have no basis in merit. If you have issues with the way I administer my pod, speak up, provide alternatives. If you have good technical suggestions for Twtxt/Yarn, weā€™re all ears. We are only trying (or attempt to try) to make things better for all, which as you can appreciate is a hard thing to do.

Next time, please leave your constructive criticisms at home. No-one forces you to use my pod (for free).

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » @dfaria And here I thought you never or we're not capable (client?) of interacting with other users? šŸ¤£

Oh never mind! šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚ļø Thatā€™s your other feed that you syndicate some stuff to? šŸ¤” Research?

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Been clearing out my pod a bit and blocking unwanted domains that are basically either a) just noise and/or b) are just 1-way (whose authors never reply or are otherwise unaware of the larger ecosystem)

@dfaria And btw, even if I block a feed or whole domain, it doesnā€™t stop you from following. it just removes it from the ā€œDiscoverā€ view.

ā¤‹ Read More